On 03/13/2018 08:18 PM, John Snow wrote:
>
> On 11/28/2017 07:10 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
>> There are 2 cases I have spotted so far:
>> 1) IDE ATAPI read processing. Actually this was reported from field
>> 2) QEMU IO hmp command (found during evaluation of (1))
>>
>> SCSI code checks during acce
On 11/28/2017 07:10 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> There are 2 cases I have spotted so far:
> 1) IDE ATAPI read processing. Actually this was reported from field
> 2) QEMU IO hmp command (found during evaluation of (1))
>
> SCSI code checks during access that blk_is_available(). These patches add
>
On 12/11/2017 05:24 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> On 11/28/2017 03:10 PM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
>> There are 2 cases I have spotted so far:
>> 1) IDE ATAPI read processing. Actually this was reported from field
>> 2) QEMU IO hmp command (found during evaluation of (1))
>>
>> SCSI code checks during
On 11/28/2017 03:10 PM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> There are 2 cases I have spotted so far:
> 1) IDE ATAPI read processing. Actually this was reported from field
> 2) QEMU IO hmp command (found during evaluation of (1))
>
> SCSI code checks during access that blk_is_available(). These patches add
> sa
On 11/28/2017 08:28 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 28 November 2017 at 17:01, John Snow wrote:
>> It's not your fault, it's mine for letting this go for a release. It's
>> just unfortunate timing. I'm looking at (at least) the IDE portion of
>> this and the underlying cause in block-backend today.
On 28 November 2017 at 17:01, John Snow wrote:
> It's not your fault, it's mine for letting this go for a release. It's
> just unfortunate timing. I'm looking at (at least) the IDE portion of
> this and the underlying cause in block-backend today.
If it's not a regression, and nobody reported it
On 11/28/2017 11:29 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> On 11/28/2017 07:08 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 28.11.2017 um 13:10 hat Denis V. Lunev geschrieben:
>>> There are 2 cases I have spotted so far:
>>> 1) IDE ATAPI read processing. Actually this was reported from field
>>> 2) QEMU IO hmp command (foun
On 11/28/2017 07:08 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 28.11.2017 um 13:10 hat Denis V. Lunev geschrieben:
>> There are 2 cases I have spotted so far:
>> 1) IDE ATAPI read processing. Actually this was reported from field
>> 2) QEMU IO hmp command (found during evaluation of (1))
>>
>> SCSI code checks dur
Am 28.11.2017 um 13:10 hat Denis V. Lunev geschrieben:
> There are 2 cases I have spotted so far:
> 1) IDE ATAPI read processing. Actually this was reported from field
> 2) QEMU IO hmp command (found during evaluation of (1))
>
> SCSI code checks during access that blk_is_available(). These patche
There are 2 cases I have spotted so far:
1) IDE ATAPI read processing. Actually this was reported from field
2) QEMU IO hmp command (found during evaluation of (1))
SCSI code checks during access that blk_is_available(). These patches add
same checks on different code paths.
Pls decide whether th
10 matches
Mail list logo
