On 07/27/2017 08:25 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi, following Cleber Rosa example I cleaned more invalid references.
>
> Eric said this can wait 2.11, however these patches don't change any code
> generated, I think the 2.10 users deserve an up-to-date doc :p
I think what I said was: this
On 28/07/2017 03:25, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Eric said this can wait 2.11, however these patches don't change any code
> generated, I think the 2.10 users deserve an up-to-date doc :p
I agree, especially because this is a 2.10 regression.
Paolo
28.07.2017 04:25, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi, following Cleber Rosa example I cleaned more invalid references.
>
> Eric said this can wait 2.11, however these patches don't change any code
> generated, I think the 2.10 users deserve an up-to-date doc :p
Applied all to -trivial, thanks!
/
On 07/27/2017 10:25 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi, following Cleber Rosa example I cleaned more invalid references.
Eric said this can wait 2.11, however these patches don't change any code
generated, I think the 2.10 users deserve an up-to-date doc :p
Well if someone is looking at that
Hi, following Cleber Rosa example I cleaned more invalid references.
Eric said this can wait 2.11, however these patches don't change any code
generated, I think the 2.10 users deserve an up-to-date doc :p
I used the following command (and consider include it in some CI test job):
$ git grep doc
