On 4/29/19 7:43 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> It would be nice if we could do a compile-time assert that
> offsetof(CPUArchState, neg) + sizeof(CPUNegativeOffsetState)
> == offsetof(CPUArchState, env)
>
> but I guess the possibility of within-struct padding
> between the two structs makes that dub
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 23:35, Richard Henderson
wrote:
>
> Nothing in there so far, but all of the plumbing done
> within the target ArchCPU state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
> +/*
> + * This structure must be placed in ArchCPU immedately
> + * before CPUArchState, as a field named "ne
Nothing in there so far, but all of the plumbing done
within the target ArchCPU state.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
include/exec/cpu-all.h | 25 +
include/exec/cpu-defs.h | 8
target/alpha/cpu.h | 1 +
target/arm/cpu.h| 1 +
target/cris/c
