On Thu 09 Aug 2018 11:35:01 PM CEST, Max Reitz wrote:
> @@ -295,11 +296,13 @@ static int qcow_open(BlockDriverState *bs, QDict
> *options, int flags,
> goto fail;
> }
> ret = bdrv_pread(bs->file, header.backing_file_offset,
> - bs->backing_file, len
On Fri 07 Sep 2018 02:42:53 PM CEST, Max Reitz wrote:
> The whole purpose of bs->auto_backing_file is so you can compare it
> with bs->backing->bs->filename, see when it differs, and then you know
> that the user has changed the backing file from what it would be based
> on the image header alone (
On 2018-09-07 14:28, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Fri 07 Sep 2018 01:32:58 PM CEST, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 2018-09-05 16:22, Alberto Garcia wrote:
>>> On Thu 09 Aug 2018 11:35:01 PM CEST, Max Reitz wrote:
If the backing file is overridden, this most probably does change the
guest-visible da
On Fri 07 Sep 2018 01:32:58 PM CEST, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 2018-09-05 16:22, Alberto Garcia wrote:
>> On Thu 09 Aug 2018 11:35:01 PM CEST, Max Reitz wrote:
>>> If the backing file is overridden, this most probably does change the
>>> guest-visible data of a BDS. Therefore, we will need to consider
On 2018-09-05 16:22, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Thu 09 Aug 2018 11:35:01 PM CEST, Max Reitz wrote:
>> If the backing file is overridden, this most probably does change the
>> guest-visible data of a BDS. Therefore, we will need to consider this
>> in bdrv_refresh_filename().
>>
>> To see whether i
On Thu 09 Aug 2018 11:35:01 PM CEST, Max Reitz wrote:
> If the backing file is overridden, this most probably does change the
> guest-visible data of a BDS. Therefore, we will need to consider this
> in bdrv_refresh_filename().
>
> To see whether it has been overridden, we might want to compare
>
If the backing file is overridden, this most probably does change the
guest-visible data of a BDS. Therefore, we will need to consider this
in bdrv_refresh_filename().
To see whether it has been overridden, we might want to compare
bs->backing_file and bs->backing->bs->filename. However,
bs->bac
