On Wed, 12/07 13:52, Peter Xu wrote:
> The first patch did some check to make sure the CE GAW bits are always
> valid (it can overflow in old codes, I see it dangerous).
>
> The second patch extended VT-d GAW (Guest Address Width) from 39 bits
> to 48 bits.
>
> Please review. Thanks,
>
> Peter X
The first patch did some check to make sure the CE GAW bits are always
valid (it can overflow in old codes, I see it dangerous).
The second patch extended VT-d GAW (Guest Address Width) from 39 bits
to 48 bits.
Please review. Thanks,
Peter Xu (2):
intel_iommu: check validity for GAW bits in CE
