On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 04:52:18PM -0400, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 04:31:33PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > +TraceEvent *trace_event_iter_next(TraceEventIter *iter)
> > +{
> > +TraceEvent *ev;
> > +
> > +if (iter->event >= TRACE_EVENT_COUNT) {
> > +ret
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 04:31:33PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> +TraceEvent *trace_event_iter_next(TraceEventIter *iter)
> +{
> +TraceEvent *ev;
> +
> +if (iter->event >= TRACE_EVENT_COUNT) {
> +return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +ev = &(trace_events[iter->event]);
> +
> +do
Currently methods which want to iterate over trace events,
do so using the trace_event_count() and trace_event_id()
methods. This leaks the concept of a single ID enum to
the callers. There is an alternative trace_event_pattern()
method which can be used in an iteration context, but its
design is s
