Laurent Vivier writes:
> Le 12/08/2015 06:07, Richard Henderson a écrit :
>> Is there a reason you've skipped the 0 value when adding the new values?
>
> I think there is no reason, but if I change the value I have to update
> abdc_mem, sbcd_mem instructions as they use it as an
> incrementer/dec
Le 12/08/2015 06:07, Richard Henderson a écrit :
> On 08/09/2015 01:13 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> -#define OS_BYTE 0
>> -#define OS_WORD 1
>> -#define OS_LONG 2
>> -#define OS_SINGLE 4
>> -#define OS_DOUBLE 5
>> +#define OS_BYTE 1
>> +#define OS_WORD 2
>> +#define OS_LONG 3
>> +#def
On 08/09/2015 01:13 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
-#define OS_BYTE 0
-#define OS_WORD 1
-#define OS_LONG 2
-#define OS_SINGLE 4
-#define OS_DOUBLE 5
+#define OS_BYTE 1
+#define OS_WORD 2
+#define OS_LONG 3
+#define OS_SINGLE 4
+#define OS_DOUBLE 5
+#define OS_EXTENDED 6
+#define OS_PA
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier
---
target-m68k/translate.c | 78 +
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-m68k/translate.c b/target-m68k/translate.c
index 6ba71a2..eb7f503 100644
--- a/target-m68k/translate.c
+++ b/tar
