On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 03:56:48PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:19:54 +0100
> Greg Kurz wrote:
>
> > The current code assumes that only the CPU core object holds a
> > reference on each individual CPU object, and happily frees their
> > allocated memory when the core is un
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:19:54 +0100
Greg Kurz wrote:
> The current code assumes that only the CPU core object holds a
> reference on each individual CPU object, and happily frees their
> allocated memory when the core is unrealized. This is dangerous
> as some other code can legitimely keep a poin
The current code assumes that only the CPU core object holds a
reference on each individual CPU object, and happily frees their
allocated memory when the core is unrealized. This is dangerous
as some other code can legitimely keep a pointer to a CPU if it
calls object_ref(), but it would end up wit
