Il 18/02/2013 17:02, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
> Applied. Thanks.
Hmm, since this is late for 1.4 patch 2 should be reverted.
Paolo
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> Il 18/02/2013 21:43, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
>> Il 18/02/2013 17:02, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
>>> Applied. Thanks.
>>
>> Hmm, since this is late for 1.4 patch 2 should be reverted.
>
> Oops, it's just the applied message that was late. Sorry for the
> noise.
Yeah,
Il 18/02/2013 21:43, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
> Il 18/02/2013 17:02, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
>> Applied. Thanks.
>
> Hmm, since this is late for 1.4 patch 2 should be reverted.
Oops, it's just the applied message that was late. Sorry for the noise.
Paolo
Applied. Thanks.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Eric Blake writes:
> On 02/13/2013 07:54 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Why am I proposing these patches for 1.4?
>>
>> PATCH 1/2 is a straightforward doc fix.
>>
>> PATCH 2/2 cleans up a part of QAPI that has never been released,
>> before it's too late. If we're already beyond the point whe
On 02/13/2013 07:54 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Why am I proposing these patches for 1.4?
>
> PATCH 1/2 is a straightforward doc fix.
>
> PATCH 2/2 cleans up a part of QAPI that has never been released,
> before it's too late. If we're already beyond the point where we can
> do that, too bad,
On 02/13/13 15:54, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Why am I proposing these patches for 1.4?
>
> PATCH 1/2 is a straightforward doc fix.
>
> PATCH 2/2 cleans up a part of QAPI that has never been released,
> before it's too late. If we're already beyond the point where we can
> do that, too bad, we'l
Why am I proposing these patches for 1.4?
PATCH 1/2 is a straightforward doc fix.
PATCH 2/2 cleans up a part of QAPI that has never been released,
before it's too late. If we're already beyond the point where we can
do that, too bad, we'll live.
Please consider seriously.
Markus Armbruster (2)
