On 2011-12-05 14:35, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 12:45:51PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
I was referring to the relation between the IOCTL and kvmclock, but
IOCTL vs. kvm_run.
Jan
>>>
>>> Ah, OK. Yes, we better characterize it as KVMCLOCK specific (a generic
>>>
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 12:45:51PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> I was referring to the relation between the IOCTL and kvmclock, but
> >> IOCTL vs. kvm_run.
> >>
> >> Jan
> >
> > Ah, OK. Yes, we better characterize it as KVMCLOCK specific (a generic
> > "guest is paused" command is not the scope o
On Sat, 03 Dec 2011, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-12-02 22:27, Eric B Munson wrote:
> > On Fri, 02 Dec 2011, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >
> >> On 2011-12-02 20:19, Eric B Munson wrote:
> >>> Often when a guest is stopped from the qemu console, it will report
> >>> spurious
> >>> soft lockup warnings on
On 2011-12-03 12:42, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 12:25:37PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-12-03 12:19, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>> On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 10:06:56AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-12-02 22:27, Eric B Munson wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Dec 2011, Jan Kisz
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 12:25:37PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-12-03 12:19, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 10:06:56AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> On 2011-12-02 22:27, Eric B Munson wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 02 Dec 2011, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>>
> On 2011-12-02 20:19, Eri
On 2011-12-03 12:19, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 10:06:56AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-12-02 22:27, Eric B Munson wrote:
>>> On Fri, 02 Dec 2011, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>
On 2011-12-02 20:19, Eric B Munson wrote:
> Often when a guest is stopped from the qemu cons
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 10:06:56AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-12-02 22:27, Eric B Munson wrote:
> > On Fri, 02 Dec 2011, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >
> >> On 2011-12-02 20:19, Eric B Munson wrote:
> >>> Often when a guest is stopped from the qemu console, it will report
> >>> spurious
> >>> soft
On 2011-12-02 22:27, Eric B Munson wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Dec 2011, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
>> On 2011-12-02 20:19, Eric B Munson wrote:
>>> Often when a guest is stopped from the qemu console, it will report spurious
>>> soft lockup warnings on resume. There are kernel patches being discussed
>>> that
On Fri, 02 Dec 2011, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-12-02 20:19, Eric B Munson wrote:
> > Often when a guest is stopped from the qemu console, it will report spurious
> > soft lockup warnings on resume. There are kernel patches being discussed
> > that
> > will give the host the ability to tell the
On 2011-12-02 20:19, Eric B Munson wrote:
> Often when a guest is stopped from the qemu console, it will report spurious
> soft lockup warnings on resume. There are kernel patches being discussed that
> will give the host the ability to tell the guest that it is being stopped and
> should ignore t
Often when a guest is stopped from the qemu console, it will report spurious
soft lockup warnings on resume. There are kernel patches being discussed that
will give the host the ability to tell the guest that it is being stopped and
should ignore the soft lockup warning that generates.
Signed-off
11 matches
Mail list logo
