Am 29.01.2013 17:24, schrieb Eric Blake:
> On 01/29/2013 07:27 AM, Benoît Canet wrote:
>>> base1 [file] --- base1 [qcow2] --- snap1.qcow2 --\
>>> base2 [file] --- base2 [qcow2] --- snap2.qcow2 --->-- quorum
>>> base3 [file] --- base3 [qcow2] --- snap3.qcow2 --/
>
> For that matter, I think it woul
Le Tuesday 29 Jan 2013 à 16:21:43 (+0100), Kevin Wolf a écrit :
> Am 29.01.2013 16:03, schrieb Benoît Canet:
> >> base1 [file] --- base1 [qcow2] --- snap1.qcow2 --\
> >> base2 [file] --- base2 [qcow2] --- snap2.qcow2 --->-- quorum
> >> base3 [file] --- base3 [qcow2] --- snap3.qcow2 --/
> >
> > I t
On 01/29/2013 07:27 AM, Benoît Canet wrote:
>> base1 [file] --- base1 [qcow2] --- snap1.qcow2 --\
>> base2 [file] --- base2 [qcow2] --- snap2.qcow2 --->-- quorum
>> base3 [file] --- base3 [qcow2] --- snap3.qcow2 --/
For that matter, I think it would be useful to have a quorum where the
data is dup
Am 29.01.2013 16:03, schrieb Benoît Canet:
>> base1 [file] --- base1 [qcow2] --- snap1.qcow2 --\
>> base2 [file] --- base2 [qcow2] --- snap2.qcow2 --->-- quorum
>> base3 [file] --- base3 [qcow2] --- snap3.qcow2 --/
>
> I tried to default snapshot creation to qcow2 in quorum.c and specify
> quorum
> base1 [file] --- base1 [qcow2] --- snap1.qcow2 --\
> base2 [file] --- base2 [qcow2] --- snap2.qcow2 --->-- quorum
> base3 [file] --- base3 [qcow2] --- snap3.qcow2 --/
I tried to default snapshot creation to qcow2 in quorum.c and specify
quorum as format in the snapshot_blkdev command line.
It do
> base1 [file] --- base1 [qcow2] --- snap1.qcow2 --\
> base2 [file] --- base2 [qcow2] --- snap2.qcow2 --->-- quorum
> base3 [file] --- base3 [qcow2] --- snap3.qcow2 --/
>
> I think the last one is what you really want, but it's certainly not the
> case that is enabled by this patch.
Yes I am try
Am 29.01.2013 14:45, schrieb Benoît Canet:
> Le Tuesday 29 Jan 2013 à 14:25:42 (+0100), Kevin Wolf a écrit :
>> Am 29.01.2013 14:07, schrieb Benoît Canet:
Wait, what's happening here? I don't understand this patch and how it's
related to snapshotting non-file protocols (if this is even wh
Le Tuesday 29 Jan 2013 à 14:25:42 (+0100), Kevin Wolf a écrit :
> Am 29.01.2013 14:07, schrieb Benoît Canet:
> >> Wait, what's happening here? I don't understand this patch and how it's
> >> related to snapshotting non-file protocols (if this is even what you
> >> mean). What is your exact scenario
Am 29.01.2013 14:07, schrieb Benoît Canet:
>> Wait, what's happening here? I don't understand this patch and how it's
>> related to snapshotting non-file protocols (if this is even what you
>> mean). What is your exact scenario, what does the existing code do in
>> it, and how does this change impr
> Wait, what's happening here? I don't understand this patch and how it's
> related to snapshotting non-file protocols (if this is even what you
> mean). What is your exact scenario, what does the existing code do in
> it, and how does this change improve it? An empty commit message is
> definitely
Am 28.01.2013 18:04, schrieb Benoît Canet:
> Signed-off-by: Benoit Canet
> ---
> blockdev.c |3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/blockdev.c b/blockdev.c
> index 0ce45c5..b1f388b 100644
> --- a/blockdev.c
> +++ b/blockdev.c
> @@ -800,7 +800,8 @@ void qmp_t
Signed-off-by: Benoit Canet
---
blockdev.c |3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/blockdev.c b/blockdev.c
index 0ce45c5..b1f388b 100644
--- a/blockdev.c
+++ b/blockdev.c
@@ -800,7 +800,8 @@ void qmp_transaction(BlockdevActionList *dev_list, Error
**errp)
12 matches
Mail list logo
