On 10/13/2014 11:31 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 10/10/2014 09:03 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Jason Wang writes:
>>
>>> Commit 1ceef9f27359cbe92ef124bf74de6f792e71f6fb (net: multiqueue
>>> support) tries to use set_pointer() and get_pointer() to set and get
>>> NICPeers which is not a pointer de
On 10/10/2014 09:03 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Jason Wang writes:
>
>> Commit 1ceef9f27359cbe92ef124bf74de6f792e71f6fb (net: multiqueue
>> support) tries to use set_pointer() and get_pointer() to set and get
>> NICPeers which is not a pointer defined in DEFINE_PROP_NETDEV. This
>> trick works
Jason Wang writes:
> Commit 1ceef9f27359cbe92ef124bf74de6f792e71f6fb (net: multiqueue
> support) tries to use set_pointer() and get_pointer() to set and get
> NICPeers which is not a pointer defined in DEFINE_PROP_NETDEV. This
> trick works but result a unclean and fragile implementation (e.g
> p
Commit 1ceef9f27359cbe92ef124bf74de6f792e71f6fb (net: multiqueue
support) tries to use set_pointer() and get_pointer() to set and get
NICPeers which is not a pointer defined in DEFINE_PROP_NETDEV. This
trick works but result a unclean and fragile implementation (e.g
print_netdev and parse_netdev).