On 12/10/2013 06:20 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 10.12.2013, at 18:15, Fabien Chouteau wrote:
>> Unfortunately I won't have time to fix before January.
>
Hello Alex,
I fixed the compiler errors and I will send version 3 in few minutes.
> That works for me. While at it, please also add a pat
On 10.12.2013, at 18:15, Fabien Chouteau wrote:
> On 12/10/2013 01:48 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 10.12.2013, at 12:59, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/10/2013 02:15 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 22.07.2013, at 18:00, Fabien Chouteau wrote:
> This implemen
On 12/10/2013 01:48 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 10.12.2013, at 12:59, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>
>> On 12/10/2013 02:15 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>> On 22.07.2013, at 18:00, Fabien Chouteau wrote:
>>>
This implementation doesn't include ring priority, TCP/IP Off-Load, QoS.
>>>
On 10.12.2013, at 12:59, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 12/10/2013 02:15 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 22.07.2013, at 18:00, Fabien Chouteau wrote:
>>
>>> This implementation doesn't include ring priority, TCP/IP Off-Load, QoS.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Fabien Chouteau
>>
>> Thanks, ap
On 12/10/2013 02:15 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 22.07.2013, at 18:00, Fabien Chouteau wrote:
>
>> This implementation doesn't include ring priority, TCP/IP Off-Load, QoS.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fabien Chouteau
>
> Thanks, applied to ppc-next. Could you please follow up with a patch that
>
On 22.07.2013, at 18:00, Fabien Chouteau wrote:
> This implementation doesn't include ring priority, TCP/IP Off-Load, QoS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabien Chouteau
Thanks, applied to ppc-next. Could you please follow up with a patch that makes
this available as -net nic,model=etsec and generate a
