On Wed, 13 Apr 2011, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-04-13 13:49, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Apr 2011, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> On 2011-04-13 12:56, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Well, either you have a use for the VCPU state (how do you do mi
On 2011-04-13 13:49, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2011, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-04-13 12:56, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Well, either you have a use for the VCPU state (how do you do migration
in Xen without it?), or you should p
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-04-13 12:56, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> Well, either you have a use for the VCPU state (how do you do migration
> >> in Xen without it?), or you should probably teach QEMU in a careful &
> >> clean way t
On 2011-04-13 12:56, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Well, either you have a use for the VCPU state (how do you do migration
>> in Xen without it?), or you should probably teach QEMU in a careful &
>> clean way to run its device model without VCPUs - and withou
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Well, either you have a use for the VCPU state (how do you do migration
> in Xen without it?), or you should probably teach QEMU in a careful &
> clean way to run its device model without VCPUs - and without any
> TCG-related memory consumption. For the latt
On 2011-04-12 16:57, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 20:55, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
>> On 2011-04-11 20:10, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> }
>
> static CPUState *pc_new_cpu(const char *cpu_model)
> @@ -952,7 +957,12 @@ void pc_cpus_init(const char *cpu_model)
> #endif
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 20:55, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
> On 2011-04-11 20:10, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> static CPUState *pc_new_cpu(const char *cpu_model)
> >>> @@ -952,7 +957,12 @@ void pc_cpus_init(const char *cpu_model)
> >>> #endif
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> - for(i = 0; i < sm
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> [ Late comments, I know, sorry. Just happen to came across this. ]
>
> On 2011-03-29 20:27, anthony.per...@citrix.com wrote:
> > From: Anthony PERARD
> >
> > Introduce the Xen FV (Fully Virtualized) machine to Qemu, some more Xen
> > specific call will be a
On 2011-04-11 20:10, Anthony PERARD wrote:
>>> }
>>>
>>> static CPUState *pc_new_cpu(const char *cpu_model)
>>> @@ -952,7 +957,12 @@ void pc_cpus_init(const char *cpu_model)
>>> #endif
>>> }
>>>
>>> -for(i = 0; i < smp_cpus; i++) {
>>> +if (!xen_enabled()) {
>>> +for(i = 0;
From: Anthony PERARD
Introduce the Xen FV (Fully Virtualized) machine to Qemu, some more Xen
specific call will be added in further patches.
Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD
---
hw/pc.c | 19 +--
hw/pc_piix.c | 17 +
hw/xen.h |4
3 files chang
10 matches
Mail list logo
