On 01/19/2017 05:43 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 17:13:04 +0800
> How can you know if he other function was affected if you don't even
> have a cable connected?
Will try ask for another cable for the other function.
> How is testing on something that doesn't seem
> to work
On 01/19/2017 05:43 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 17:13:04 +0800
> Cao jin wrote:
>
>> As previous discussion suggest, we could take a step back to handle non-fatal
>> error first, this will make this patchset much more thinner, because we could
>> drop all the configuration
On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 17:13:04 +0800
Cao jin wrote:
> As previous discussion suggest, we could take a step back to handle non-fatal
> error first, this will make this patchset much more thinner, because we could
> drop all the configuration restriction related patches.
>
> FYI: patch 1 has been ch
Hi,
Your series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:
Message-id: 1483175588-17006-1-git-send-email-caoj.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
Type: series
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v11 0/4] vfio-pci: pass non-fatal error to
guest
=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN
As previous discussion suggest, we could take a step back to handle non-fatal
error first, this will make this patchset much more thinner, because we could
drop all the configuration restriction related patches.
FYI: patch 1 has been cherry picked into another series, and wait to be merged
first,
