On 2015-06-02 13:58, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 06/02/2015 01:10 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > It looks like we have to go through the MMIO functions to get the
> > TLB_NOTDIRTY bit cleaned correctly. This is something we don't want for
> > probe_write, so we definitely want two different functi
On 2015-06-02 13:54, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 06/02/2015 04:26 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > int index = (addr >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS) & (CPU_TLB_SIZE - 1);
> > -CPUTLBEntry *tlbentry = &env->tlb_table[mmu_idx][index];
> > +CPUTLBEntry *tlbentry;
> > target_ulong tlb_addr;
> >
On 2 June 2015 at 21:58, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 06/02/2015 01:10 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> It looks like we have to go through the MMIO functions to get the
>> TLB_NOTDIRTY bit cleaned correctly. This is something we don't want for
>> probe_write, so we definitely want two different func
On 06/02/2015 01:10 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> It looks like we have to go through the MMIO functions to get the
> TLB_NOTDIRTY bit cleaned correctly. This is something we don't want for
> probe_write, so we definitely want two different functions.
I think that's why target-arm does it's somewhat
On 06/02/2015 04:26 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> int index = (addr >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS) & (CPU_TLB_SIZE - 1);
> -CPUTLBEntry *tlbentry = &env->tlb_table[mmu_idx][index];
> +CPUTLBEntry *tlbentry;
> target_ulong tlb_addr;
> uintptr_t haddr;
>
> +again:
> +tlbentry = &env-
On 2015-06-02 13:26, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> The softmmu code already provides a tlb_vaddr_to_host function, which
> returns the host address corresponding to a guest virtual address,
> *if it is already in the QEMU MMU TLB*.
>
> This patch is an attempt to have a function which try to fill the TL
The softmmu code already provides a tlb_vaddr_to_host function, which
returns the host address corresponding to a guest virtual address,
*if it is already in the QEMU MMU TLB*.
This patch is an attempt to have a function which try to fill the TLB
entry if it is not already in the QEMU MMU TLB, pos
