On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:04:21AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 02:29:08PM +0800, Hu Tao wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 01:00:56PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 12:48:55PM +0800, Hu Tao wrote:
> > > > Michael,
> > > >
> > > > This
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 02:29:08PM +0800, Hu Tao wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 01:00:56PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 12:48:55PM +0800, Hu Tao wrote:
> > > Michael,
> > >
> > > This is fixes for your pci tree.
> > >
> > > patch 1 remove signed range as requeste
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 01:00:56PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 12:48:55PM +0800, Hu Tao wrote:
> > Michael,
> >
> > This is fixes for your pci tree.
> >
> > patch 1 remove signed range as requested.
>
> This also fixes make check failures so I applied this.
>
> Ot
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 12:48:55PM +0800, Hu Tao wrote:
> Michael,
>
> This is fixes for your pci tree.
>
> patch 1 remove signed range as requested.
This also fixes make check failures so I applied this.
Others don't look like regressions to me -
this is error handling in new functionality, co
Michael,
This is fixes for your pci tree.
patch 1 remove signed range as requested.
There are 3 problems in current pci tree, as follows:
1. pc-dimm specified on command line but only -m size (aka not -m
size,maxmem,slots)
./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -hda
/home/data/libvirt-images/f18
