On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 01:47:59PM +, Paul Brook wrote:
> > > > Now an OS can have a standard driver and use it
> > > > to activate hotplug functionality. This is OS hotplug (OSHP).
> > >
> > > So presumably this will work on targets that don't have ACPI?
> > > Assuming a competent guest OS of
> > > Now an OS can have a standard driver and use it
> > > to activate hotplug functionality. This is OS hotplug (OSHP).
> >
> > So presumably this will work on targets that don't have ACPI?
> > Assuming a competent guest OS of course. Have you tested this?
>
> This being the qemu side of thing
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:49:08PM +, Paul Brook wrote:
> > > In a nutshell, I don't know what a SHPC is (nor OSHP), so I'm looking
> > > for an additional Ack.
> >
> > No problem, I'll get an Ack :)
> > Meanwhile - here's a summary, as far as I understand it.
> >
> > Originally PCI SIG only
> > In a nutshell, I don't know what a SHPC is (nor OSHP), so I'm looking
> > for an additional Ack.
>
> No problem, I'll get an Ack :)
> Meanwhile - here's a summary, as far as I understand it.
>
> Originally PCI SIG only defined the electrical
> and mechanical requirements from hotplug, no stan
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 07:48:37PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 02:43:45AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 07:34:55PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:33:08AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > To allow guests
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 02:43:45AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 07:34:55PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:33:08AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > To allow guests to load the native SHPC driver
> > > for a bridge, we must declare an O
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 07:34:55PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:33:08AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > To allow guests to load the native SHPC driver
> > for a bridge, we must declare an OSHP method
> > for the appropriate device which lets the OS
> > take control
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:33:08AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> To allow guests to load the native SHPC driver
> for a bridge, we must declare an OSHP method
> for the appropriate device which lets the OS
> take control of the SHPC.
> As we don't access SHPC at the moment, we
> don't need to
To allow guests to load the native SHPC driver
for a bridge, we must declare an OSHP method
for the appropriate device which lets the OS
take control of the SHPC.
As we don't access SHPC at the moment, we
don't need to do anything - just report success.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
---
dif