On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Ronald Hecht wrote:
> On 09/19/2012 09:19 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Ronald Hecht wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> This patch adds SMP support to the LEON SPARC interrupt controller.
>>> I don't like that CPU status (halted/not halted) is access
On 09/19/2012 09:19 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Ronald Hecht wrote:
This patch adds SMP support to the LEON SPARC interrupt controller.
I don't like that CPU status (halted/not halted) is accessed directly
from the interrupt controller. How can this be implemented
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Ronald Hecht wrote:
> This patch adds SMP support to the LEON SPARC interrupt controller.
> I don't like that CPU status (halted/not halted) is accessed directly
> from the interrupt controller. How can this be implemented more elegant?
> Ideally the CPUSPARCState
This patch adds SMP support to the LEON SPARC interrupt controller.
I don't like that CPU status (halted/not halted) is accessed directly
from the interrupt controller. How can this be implemented more elegant?
Ideally the CPUSPARCState should not be accessed directly.
Signed-off-by: Ronald Hecht