On 05/03/2018 01:59 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 09:47:18AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> On 05/03/2018 08:21 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>>> To prevent spurious wakeups on cpus that are supposed to be disabled, we
>>> need to clear the LPCR bits which control certain wakeup ev
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 09:47:18AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 05/03/2018 08:21 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > To prevent spurious wakeups on cpus that are supposed to be disabled, we
> > need to clear the LPCR bits which control certain wakeup events.
> > spapr_cpu_reset() has separate cases
On 05/03/2018 08:21 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> To prevent spurious wakeups on cpus that are supposed to be disabled, we
> need to clear the LPCR bits which control certain wakeup events.
> spapr_cpu_reset() has separate cases here for boot and non-boot (initially
> inactive) cpus. rtas_start_cpu()
To prevent spurious wakeups on cpus that are supposed to be disabled, we
need to clear the LPCR bits which control certain wakeup events.
spapr_cpu_reset() has separate cases here for boot and non-boot (initially
inactive) cpus. rtas_start_cpu() then turns the LPCR bits on when the
non-boot cpus a