Am 27.04.2012 22:21, schrieb Michael Roth:
> Valid range for devfn is -1 to 255 (-1 for automatic assignment). We do
> not currently validate this due to devfn being stored as a uint32_t.
> This can lead to segfaults and other strange behavior.
>
> We could technically just cast it to int32_t to i
Valid range for devfn is -1 to 255 (-1 for automatic assignment). We do
not currently validate this due to devfn being stored as a uint32_t.
This can lead to segfaults and other strange behavior.
We could technically just cast it to int32_t to implement the checking,
but this will not work for vis
Valid range for devfn is -1 to 255 (-1 for automatic assignment). We do
not currently validate this due to devfn being stored as a uint32_t.
This can lead to segfaults and other strange behavior.
We could technically just cast it to int32_t to implement the checking,
but this will not work for vis
