On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 10:33:44PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Wed, 17 May 2017 14:18:16 +1000
> David Gibson wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 06:11:27PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> > > >>> +int smt = kvmppc_smt_threads();
> > > >>> +int nr_servers = DIV_ROUND_UP(max_cpu
On Wed, 17 May 2017 14:18:16 +1000
David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 06:11:27PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> > >>> +int smt = kvmppc_smt_threads();
> > >>> +int nr_servers = DIV_ROUND_UP(max_cpus * smt, smp_threads);
> > >>
> > >> may be we should reintroduce nr_se
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 02:22:32PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 05/15/2017 01:40 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > Commit 5bc8d26de20c ("spapr: allocate the ICPState object from under
> > sPAPRCPUCore") moved ICP objects from the machine to CPU cores. This
> > is an improvement since we no longer all
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 06:20:06PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Mon, 15 May 2017 18:09:04 +0200
> Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>
> > On 05/15/2017 03:16 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > On Mon, 15 May 2017 14:22:32 +0200
> > > Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 05/15/2017 01:40 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 06:11:27PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> >>> +int smt = kvmppc_smt_threads();
> >>> +int nr_servers = DIV_ROUND_UP(max_cpus * smt, smp_threads);
> >>
> >> may be we should reintroduce nr_servers at the machine level ?
> >>
> >
> > I had reintroduced it
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 03:16:02PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Mon, 15 May 2017 14:22:32 +0200
> Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>
> > On 05/15/2017 01:40 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
[snip]
> > > +
> > > +object_initialize(obj, sizeof(ICPState), spapr->icp_type);
> > > +object_property_
On Mon, 15 May 2017 18:11:27 +0200
Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> >>> +int smt = kvmppc_smt_threads();
> >>> +int nr_servers = DIV_ROUND_UP(max_cpus * smt, smp_threads);
> >>
> >> may be we should reintroduce nr_servers at the machine level ?
> >>
> >
> > I had reintroduced it
On Mon, 15 May 2017 18:09:04 +0200
Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 05/15/2017 03:16 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 May 2017 14:22:32 +0200
> > Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> >
> >> On 05/15/2017 01:40 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> >>> Commit 5bc8d26de20c ("spapr: allocate the ICPState object from und
>>> +int smt = kvmppc_smt_threads();
>>> +int nr_servers = DIV_ROUND_UP(max_cpus * smt, smp_threads);
>>
>> may be we should reintroduce nr_servers at the machine level ?
>>
>
> I had reintroduced it but then I realized it was only used in this
> function.
nr_servers is also us
On 05/15/2017 03:16 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Mon, 15 May 2017 14:22:32 +0200
> Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>
>> On 05/15/2017 01:40 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
>>> Commit 5bc8d26de20c ("spapr: allocate the ICPState object from under
>>> sPAPRCPUCore") moved ICP objects from the machine to CPU cores. This
>
On Mon, 15 May 2017 14:22:32 +0200
Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 05/15/2017 01:40 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > Commit 5bc8d26de20c ("spapr: allocate the ICPState object from under
> > sPAPRCPUCore") moved ICP objects from the machine to CPU cores. This
> > is an improvement since we no longer allocate
On 05/15/2017 01:40 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> Commit 5bc8d26de20c ("spapr: allocate the ICPState object from under
> sPAPRCPUCore") moved ICP objects from the machine to CPU cores. This
> is an improvement since we no longer allocate ICP objects that will
> never be used. But it has the side-effect of
Commit 5bc8d26de20c ("spapr: allocate the ICPState object from under
sPAPRCPUCore") moved ICP objects from the machine to CPU cores. This
is an improvement since we no longer allocate ICP objects that will
never be used. But it has the side-effect of breaking migration of
older machine types from o
13 matches
Mail list logo
