Orit Wasserman wrote:
> It is better to fail migration in case of failure to
> allocate new cache item
>
> Signed-off-by: Orit Wasserman
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela
On 01/30/2014 06:08 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
* Orit Wasserman (owass...@redhat.com) wrote:
It is better to fail migration in case of failure to
allocate new cache item
Does this actually fail migration or just drop back to sending an uncompressed
page? (I think the latter, and that's
* Orit Wasserman (owass...@redhat.com) wrote:
> It is better to fail migration in case of failure to
> allocate new cache item
Does this actually fail migration or just drop back to sending an uncompressed
page? (I think the latter, and that's an even better result).
> Signed-off-by: Orit Wasserm
It is better to fail migration in case of failure to
allocate new cache item
Signed-off-by: Orit Wasserman
---
arch_init.c| 4 +++-
include/migration/page_cache.h | 4 +++-
page_cache.c | 16 +++-
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(
