On 03/14/2013 05:06 PM, mdroth wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:24:03AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 03/14/2013 11:11 AM, mdroth wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:51:49AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 03/14/2013 10:28 AM, mdroth wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 09:39:14AM -0400, Stefan Berg
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:24:03AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 03/14/2013 11:11 AM, mdroth wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:51:49AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> >>On 03/14/2013 10:28 AM, mdroth wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 09:39:14AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 03/14/2013
On 03/14/2013 11:11 AM, mdroth wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:51:49AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 03/14/2013 10:28 AM, mdroth wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 09:39:14AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 03/14/2013 08:18 AM, mdroth wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 09:48:11PM -0400, Stefan Berg
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:51:49AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 03/14/2013 10:28 AM, mdroth wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 09:39:14AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> >>On 03/14/2013 08:18 AM, mdroth wrote:
> >>>On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 09:48:11PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 03/13/2013
On 03/14/2013 10:28 AM, mdroth wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 09:39:14AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 03/14/2013 08:18 AM, mdroth wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 09:48:11PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 03/13/2013 07:18 PM, mdroth wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 06:00:24PM -0400, Stefan Berg
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 09:39:14AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 03/14/2013 08:18 AM, mdroth wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 09:48:11PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> >>On 03/13/2013 07:18 PM, mdroth wrote:
> >>>On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 06:00:24PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 03/13/2013
On 03/14/2013 08:18 AM, mdroth wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 09:48:11PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 03/13/2013 07:18 PM, mdroth wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 06:00:24PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 03/13/2013 04:52 PM, mdroth wrote:
Visitors don't have any knowledge of the data struct
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 09:48:11PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 03/13/2013 07:18 PM, mdroth wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 06:00:24PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> >>On 03/13/2013 04:52 PM, mdroth wrote:
> >>
> >Visitors don't have any knowledge of the data structures they're visiting
> >out
On 03/13/2013 07:18 PM, mdroth wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 06:00:24PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 03/13/2013 04:52 PM, mdroth wrote:
Visitors don't have any knowledge of the data structures they're visiting
outside of what we tell them via the visit_*() API.
[...]
For example, a visito
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 06:00:24PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 03/13/2013 04:52 PM, mdroth wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 01:56:24PM -0500, Joel Schopp wrote:
> >>Add a sized buffer interface to qapi.
> >Isn't this just a special case of the visit_*_carray() interfaces? We
> >should avoid n
On 03/13/2013 04:52 PM, mdroth wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 01:56:24PM -0500, Joel Schopp wrote:
Add a sized buffer interface to qapi.
Isn't this just a special case of the visit_*_carray() interfaces? We
should avoid new interfaces if possible, since it adds to feature
disparities between vi
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 01:56:24PM -0500, Joel Schopp wrote:
> Add a sized buffer interface to qapi.
Isn't this just a special case of the visit_*_carray() interfaces? We
should avoid new interfaces if possible, since it adds to feature
disparities between visitor implementations.
>
> Cc: Michae
Add a sized buffer interface to qapi.
Cc: Michael Tsirkin
Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger
Signed-off-by: Joel Schopp
---
include/qapi/visitor-impl.h |2 ++
include/qapi/visitor.h |2 ++
qapi/qapi-visit-core.c |8
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/inclu
Add a sized buffer interface to qapi.
Cc: Michael Tsirkin
Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger
Signed-off-by: Joel Schopp
---
include/qapi/visitor-impl.h |2 ++
include/qapi/visitor.h |2 ++
qapi/qapi-visit-core.c |8
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/inclu
14 matches
Mail list logo