On 16.10.18 00:39, Cleber Rosa wrote:
>
>
> On 10/15/18 10:14 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
>> In Python 3, several functions now return iterators instead of lists.
>> This includes range(), items(), map(), and filter(). This means that if
>> we really want a list, we have to wrap those instances with li
On 15.10.18 22:07, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 04:14:49PM +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
>> In Python 3, several functions now return iterators instead of lists.
>> This includes range(), items(), map(), and filter(). This means that if
>> we really want a list, we have to wrap those
On 10/15/18 10:14 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
> In Python 3, several functions now return iterators instead of lists.
> This includes range(), items(), map(), and filter(). This means that if
> we really want a list, we have to wrap those instances with list(). On
> the other hand, sometimes we do ju
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 04:14:49PM +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
> In Python 3, several functions now return iterators instead of lists.
> This includes range(), items(), map(), and filter(). This means that if
> we really want a list, we have to wrap those instances with list(). On
> the other hand, s
In Python 3, several functions now return iterators instead of lists.
This includes range(), items(), map(), and filter(). This means that if
we really want a list, we have to wrap those instances with list(). On
the other hand, sometimes we do just want an iterator, in which case we
have sometim
