On 24/05/2016 05:04, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Mon, 05/23 14:54, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > scsi-block will be able to do FUA just by passing the request through
> > to the LUN (which is also more efficient); there is no need to emulate
> > it like we do for scsi-disk.
>
> Even for scsi-disk, shall we
On Mon, 05/23 14:54, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> scsi-block will be able to do FUA just by passing the request through
> to the LUN (which is also more efficient); there is no need to emulate
> it like we do for scsi-disk.
Even for scsi-disk, shall we just use the block layer FUA fallback already by
pa
On 05/23/2016 06:54 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> scsi-block will be able to do FUA just by passing the request through
> to the LUN (which is also more efficient); there is no need to emulate
> it like we do for scsi-disk.
>
> Add a new method to distinguish this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
scsi-block will be able to do FUA just by passing the request through
to the LUN (which is also more efficient); there is no need to emulate
it like we do for scsi-disk.
Add a new method to distinguish this.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
---
hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c | 9 +++--
1 file changed, 7 i
