On 11 December 2014 at 16:41, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> -- notice the reintroduction of the different, wrong default NaN encoding
> patterns. Will you be sending an update shortly so that I can schedule
> my MIPS IEEE 754-2008 testing tonight?
Ah, yes, as you point out these are all actually no
Peter,
> Reimplement support for architectures where the most significant bit
> in the mantissa is 1 for a signaling NaN rather than a quiet NaN,
> by adding handling for SNAN_BIT_IS_ONE being set to the functions
> which test values for NaN-ness.
>
> This includes restoring the bugfixes lost in
Reimplement support for architectures where the most significant bit
in the mantissa is 1 for a signaling NaN rather than a quiet NaN,
by adding handling for SNAN_BIT_IS_ONE being set to the functions
which test values for NaN-ness.
This includes restoring the bugfixes lost in the reversion where
