> On 5 April 2012 09:12, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > (Also, the lowest common denominator for Linux would be 2.12, not
> > 2.0.
>
> ...this doesn't seem to be what configure checks for? AFAICT it
> just wants something providing gthread-2.0.
Yes, that's correct. Our checks are way too strict.
Pao
On 5 April 2012 09:12, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> (Also, the lowest common denominator for Linux would be 2.12, not 2.0.
...this doesn't seem to be what configure checks for? AFAICT it
just wants something providing gthread-2.0.
-- PMM
- Messaggio originale -
> Da: "Blue Swirl"
> A: "Paolo Bonzini"
> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, s...@weilnetz.de
> Inviato: Mercoledì, 4 aprile 2012 22:44:12
> Oggetto: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/6] main-loop: replace
> WaitForMultipleObjects with g_
On 4 April 2012 21:44, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 09:49, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On w32, glib implements g_poll using WaitForMultipleObjects
>> or MsgWaitForMultipleObjects. This means that we can simplify
>> our code by switching to g_poll, and at the same time prepare for
>> a
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 09:49, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On w32, glib implements g_poll using WaitForMultipleObjects
> or MsgWaitForMultipleObjects. This means that we can simplify
> our code by switching to g_poll, and at the same time prepare for
> adding back glib sources.
Unfortunately g_poll d
On w32, glib implements g_poll using WaitForMultipleObjects
or MsgWaitForMultipleObjects. This means that we can simplify
our code by switching to g_poll, and at the same time prepare for
adding back glib sources.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
---
main-loop.c | 40 +
