On 17 April 2011 18:11, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 04/17/2011 10:03 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 17 April 2011 17:14, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> pc-bios/palcode-sx164 | Bin 0 -> 107781 bytes
>>
>> My personal opinion is that if we have the binary blob in qemu git
>> we should
On 04/17/2011 08:31 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 17.04.2011, at 20:26, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 04/17/2011 11:23 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
We try to keep a reference in pc-bios/README on where it comes from
and Anthony usually wants you to also add git submodule magic for
easy cloning :).
On 17.04.2011, at 20:26, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 04/17/2011 11:23 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> We try to keep a reference in pc-bios/README on where it comes from
>> and Anthony usually wants you to also add git submodule magic for
>> easy cloning :).
>
> The README is easy. I don't know
On 04/17/2011 11:23 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> We try to keep a reference in pc-bios/README on where it comes from
> and Anthony usually wants you to also add git submodule magic for
> easy cloning :).
The README is easy. I don't know what a git submodule is.
Pointers are very welcome...
r~
On 17.04.2011, at 19:11, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 04/17/2011 10:03 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 17 April 2011 17:14, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> Delete the old partial support for alpha-softmmu, which kind-of tried
>>> to emulate real HW and its PALcode. Instead, use a custom HW interfa
On 17.04.2011, at 19:12, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 04/17/2011 09:42 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> Mind to split it up? I'm having a hard time reading such huge patches O_o.
>> Awesome work, btw :).
>
> What sort of split would you like to see?
>
> I thought about it, but there's not too man
On 04/17/2011 09:42 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Mind to split it up? I'm having a hard time reading such huge patches O_o.
> Awesome work, btw :).
What sort of split would you like to see?
I thought about it, but there's not too many splits that actually
compile individually.
r~
On 04/17/2011 10:03 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 17 April 2011 17:14, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> Delete the old partial support for alpha-softmmu, which kind-of tried
>> to emulate real HW and its PALcode. Instead, use a custom HW interface
>> for a custom PALcode. Wire up as much of the devic
On 17 April 2011 17:14, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Delete the old partial support for alpha-softmmu, which kind-of tried
> to emulate real HW and its PALcode. Instead, use a custom HW interface
> for a custom PALcode. Wire up as much of the device emulation as is
> available.
> pc-bios/palcode
On 17.04.2011, at 18:14, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Delete the old partial support for alpha-softmmu, which kind-of tried
> to emulate real HW and its PALcode. Instead, use a custom HW interface
> for a custom PALcode. Wire up as much of the device emulation as is
> available.
Mind to split it
10 matches
Mail list logo