On 10/21/2015 08:20 PM, Leonid Bloch wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 10/18/2015 03:53 PM, Leonid Bloch wrote:
>>> >> Previously, the lower parts of these counters (TORL, TOTL) were
>>> >> resetting after reaching their maximal values, and since the c
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 10/18/2015 03:53 PM, Leonid Bloch wrote:
>> Previously, the lower parts of these counters (TORL, TOTL) were
>> resetting after reaching their maximal values, and since the continuation
>> of counting in the higher parts (TORH, TOTH) was t
On 10/18/2015 03:53 PM, Leonid Bloch wrote:
> Previously, the lower parts of these counters (TORL, TOTL) were
> resetting after reaching their maximal values, and since the continuation
> of counting in the higher parts (TORH, TOTH) was triggered by an
> overflow event of the lower parts, the cou
Previously, the lower parts of these counters (TORL, TOTL) were
resetting after reaching their maximal values, and since the continuation
of counting in the higher parts (TORH, TOTH) was triggered by an
overflow event of the lower parts, the count was not correct.
Additionally, TORH and TOTH were
