On 01/30/2013 07:59 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 01/30/2013 03:35 AM, Orit Wasserman wrote:
>> XBZRLE is not effective when migrating to file.
>
> Why not? When doing a live migration to file, the same sector of memory
> can be visited more than once in the migration stream, and thus
> compressing
On 01/30/2013 03:35 AM, Orit Wasserman wrote:
> XBZRLE is not effective when migrating to file.
Why not? When doing a live migration to file, the same sector of memory
can be visited more than once in the migration stream, and thus
compressing the later pages should make the saved file smaller.
On 01/30/2013 01:07 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>> On 01/30/2013 12:49 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
XBZRLE is not effective when migrating to file.
Disabling it automatically will remove the need to update the
command line to allow loading a guest from a file that was in
XBZRLE
XBZRLE is not effective when migrating to file.
Disabling it automatically will remove the need to update the
command line to allow loading a guest from a file that was in XBZRLE format.
Signed-off-by: Orit Wasserman
---
include/migration/migration.h | 1 +
migration-exec.c | 6 +++
> On 01/30/2013 12:49 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> XBZRLE is not effective when migrating to file.
> >>
> >> Disabling it automatically will remove the need to update the
> >> command line to allow loading a guest from a file that was in
> >> XBZRLE format.
> >
> > What about savevm?
> I think a
On 01/30/2013 12:49 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>> XBZRLE is not effective when migrating to file.
>>
>> Disabling it automatically will remove the need to update the
>> command line to allow loading a guest from a file that was in XBZRLE
>> format.
>
> What about savevm?
I think a user that activ
> XBZRLE is not effective when migrating to file.
>
> Disabling it automatically will remove the need to update the
> command line to allow loading a guest from a file that was in XBZRLE
> format.
What about savevm?
Paolo
> Signed-off-by: Orit Wasserman
> ---
> include/migration/migration.h
