At 06/29/2012 08:42 PM, Andreas Färber Wrote:
> Am 28.06.2012 18:46, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> On 20 June 2012 18:28, Rabin Vincent wrote:
>>> Add a minimal dump-guest-memory support for ARM. The -p option is not
>>> supported and we don't add any QEMU-specific notes.
>>
>> So what does this patc
At 07/01/2012 02:22 PM, Rabin Vincent Wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 05:46:02PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 20 June 2012 18:28, Rabin Vincent wrote:
>>> Add a minimal dump-guest-memory support for ARM. The -p option is not
>>> supported and we don't add any QEMU-specific notes.
>>
>> So w
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 05:46:02PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 20 June 2012 18:28, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> > Add a minimal dump-guest-memory support for ARM. The -p option is not
> > supported and we don't add any QEMU-specific notes.
>
> So what does this patch give us? This commit message
On 29 June 2012 13:42, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 28.06.2012 18:46, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> On 20 June 2012 18:28, Rabin Vincent wrote:
>>> +int cpu_write_elf64_note(write_core_dump_function f, CPUArchState *env,
>>> + int cpuid, void *opaque)
>>
>> Should these APIs rea
Am 28.06.2012 18:46, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 20 June 2012 18:28, Rabin Vincent wrote:
>> Add a minimal dump-guest-memory support for ARM. The -p option is not
>> supported and we don't add any QEMU-specific notes.
>
> So what does this patch give us? This commit message is pretty
> short and
On 20 June 2012 18:28, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> Add a minimal dump-guest-memory support for ARM. The -p option is not
> supported and we don't add any QEMU-specific notes.
So what does this patch give us? This commit message is pretty
short and I couldn't find a cover message for the patchset...
Add a minimal dump-guest-memory support for ARM. The -p option is not
supported and we don't add any QEMU-specific notes.
Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent
---
configure|4 +--
target-arm/Makefile.objs |2 +-
target-arm/arch_dump.c | 59 +++
