On 03/31/2015 08:29 PM, Ed Maste wrote:
On 31 March 2015 at 17:55, Ed Maste wrote:
feynman% ./tests/ahci-test
/i386/ahci/sanity: OK
/i386/ahci/pci_spec: OK
/i386/ahci/pci_enable: OK
/i386/ahci/hba_spec: OK
/i386/ahci/hba_enable: OK
/i386/ahci/identify: OK
/i386/ahci/io/pio/lba28/simple: **
E
On 31 March 2015 at 17:55, Ed Maste wrote:
>
> feynman% ./tests/ahci-test
> /i386/ahci/sanity: OK
> /i386/ahci/pci_spec: OK
> /i386/ahci/pci_enable: OK
> /i386/ahci/hba_spec: OK
> /i386/ahci/hba_enable: OK
> /i386/ahci/identify: OK
> /i386/ahci/io/pio/lba28/simple: **
> ERROR:tests/ahci-test.c:790
On 03/31/2015 05:55 PM, Ed Maste wrote:
On 31 March 2015 at 17:44, John Snow wrote:
My apologies;
Not at all, thanks for your help!
Head into your build directory and try this:
make tests/ahci-test
export QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=i386-softmmu/qemu-system-i386
export QTEST_QEMU_IMG=./qemu-img
./
On 31 March 2015 at 17:44, John Snow wrote:
>
> My apologies;
Not at all, thanks for your help!
> Head into your build directory and try this:
>
>> make tests/ahci-test
>> export QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=i386-softmmu/qemu-system-i386
>> export QTEST_QEMU_IMG=./qemu-img
>> ./tests/ahci-test
>
> This sho
On 03/31/2015 05:29 PM, Ed Maste wrote:
On 31 March 2015 at 16:58, John Snow wrote:
which test case does it fail under? io_rw_simple is shared by a number of
different tests.
I'm not sure off hand how to run an individual test to confirm, but
the testrun output up to the failure is:
LI
On 31 March 2015 at 16:58, John Snow wrote:
>
> which test case does it fail under? io_rw_simple is shared by a number of
> different tests.
I'm not sure off hand how to run an individual test to confirm, but
the testrun output up to the failure is:
LINK tests/spapr-phb-test
GTESTER check-qte
On 03/31/2015 04:55 PM, Ed Maste wrote:
On 23 March 2015 at 12:56, John Snow wrote:
My pattern was cyclical every 256 bytes, so it missed a fairly obvious
failure case. Add some rand() pepper into the test pattern, and for large
patterns that exceed 256 sectors, start writing an ID per-sector
On 23 March 2015 at 12:56, John Snow wrote:
> My pattern was cyclical every 256 bytes, so it missed a fairly obvious
> failure case. Add some rand() pepper into the test pattern, and for large
> patterns that exceed 256 sectors, start writing an ID per-sector so that
> we never generate identical
My pattern was cyclical every 256 bytes, so it missed a fairly obvious
failure case. Add some rand() pepper into the test pattern, and for large
patterns that exceed 256 sectors, start writing an ID per-sector so that
we never generate identical sector patterns.
Signed-off-by: John Snow
Reviewed-
