On 3/25/19 10:23 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> I think you should, because moving it to obj-y would be a major headache
> if we ever were to resurrect the multiarch patches by Peter C.
>
> That said, does cpu_neg really need env_neg and thus ArchCPU? Perhaps
> you could:
>
> 1) define CPUTLB in ter
On 3/25/19 10:23 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> RFC: I had problems with the build system moving qom/cpu.c
>> from common-obj-y to obj-y. Then I tried just splitting out
>> a piece of it, and ran into odder build system issues. Then
>> I hacked Makefile.target in a way that doesn't look right,
>> bu
On 23/03/19 20:09, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Amusingly, we had already ignored the comment to keep this
> value at the end of CPUState. This restores the minimum
> negative offset from TCG_AREG0 for code generation.
>
> This is slightly complicated for qom/cpu.c and tcg-all.c,
> in that they are
Amusingly, we had already ignored the comment to keep this
value at the end of CPUState. This restores the minimum
negative offset from TCG_AREG0 for code generation.
This is slightly complicated for qom/cpu.c and tcg-all.c,
in that they are compiled once. This means we need an out
of line helpe
