TL;DR: I still disagree about some points, but those points aren't so
relevant anymore because I am starting to like having
KVM-specific/TCG-specific subclasses (because of other problems that
would be solved by them).
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 04:20:43PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
[...]
> > > >
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 12:48:47 -0200
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 02:52:49AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 16:13:02 -0200
> > Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 05:54:50PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > > > Am 08.02.2013 15:52, schr
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 02:52:49AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 16:13:02 -0200
> Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 05:54:50PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > > Am 08.02.2013 15:52, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 01:58:42PM +0100, I
On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 16:13:02 -0200
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 05:54:50PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > Am 08.02.2013 15:52, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 01:58:42PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > >> On Fri, 08 Feb 2013 12:16:17 +0100
> > >> Andrea
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 05:54:50PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 08.02.2013 15:52, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> > On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 01:58:42PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> >> On Fri, 08 Feb 2013 12:16:17 +0100
> >> Andreas Färber wrote:
> >>> Am 08.02.2013 10:03, schrieb Igor Mammedov:
>
Am 08.02.2013 15:52, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 01:58:42PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>> On Fri, 08 Feb 2013 12:16:17 +0100
>> Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Am 08.02.2013 10:03, schrieb Igor Mammedov:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2013 13:08:19 -0200
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:52:31PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 01:58:42PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
[...]
> > Continuing on theoretical issue:
> > > We could add an inited field to X86CPUClass that gets checked at initfn
> > > time (only ever getting set to true by the
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 01:58:42PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Feb 2013 12:16:17 +0100
> Andreas Färber wrote:
>
> > Am 08.02.2013 10:03, schrieb Igor Mammedov:
> > > On Thu, 7 Feb 2013 13:08:19 -0200
> > > Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 05:39:22PM +010
On Fri, 08 Feb 2013 12:16:17 +0100
Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 08.02.2013 10:03, schrieb Igor Mammedov:
> > On Thu, 7 Feb 2013 13:08:19 -0200
> > Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 05:39:22PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> >>> From: Andreas Färber
> >>>
> >>> Move x86_def_t
Am 08.02.2013 10:03, schrieb Igor Mammedov:
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2013 13:08:19 -0200
> Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 05:39:22PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>>> From: Andreas Färber
>>>
>>> Move x86_def_t definition to header and embed into X86CPUClass.
>>> Register types per bui
On Thu, 7 Feb 2013 13:08:19 -0200
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 05:39:22PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > From: Andreas Färber
> >
> > Move x86_def_t definition to header and embed into X86CPUClass.
> > Register types per built-in model definition.
> >
> > Move version init
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 05:39:22PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> From: Andreas Färber
>
> Move x86_def_t definition to header and embed into X86CPUClass.
> Register types per built-in model definition.
>
> Move version initialization from x86_cpudef_setup() to class_init.
>
> Inline cpu_x86_reg
From: Andreas Färber
Move x86_def_t definition to header and embed into X86CPUClass.
Register types per built-in model definition.
Move version initialization from x86_cpudef_setup() to class_init.
Inline cpu_x86_register() into the X86CPU initfn.
Since instance_init cannot reports errors, drop
13 matches
Mail list logo