On 08/07/15 22:40, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 04:59:15PM +0200, Marc Marí wrote:
>> On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 10:47:21 -0400
>> "Kevin O'Connor" wrote:
>>> Also, it's very unusual to see 32bit writes to an unaligned IO address
>>> - I think two pad bytes should be added so that the o
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 04:59:15PM +0200, Marc Marí wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 10:47:21 -0400
> "Kevin O'Connor" wrote:
> > Also, it's very unusual to see 32bit writes to an unaligned IO address
> > - I think two pad bytes should be added so that the offset for the dma
> > address is at position
On 08/06/2015 03:32 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> (If you wanted to poke fun at me, you could say that I just repeated
> what Kevin had said, only worse. Thing is, I really don't recall seeing
> his message. Let me search my mailbox for a substring from your above
> quote... Yep, I don't have that mes
On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 23:32:50 +0200
Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 08/06/15 23:11, Marc Marí wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 22:49:12 +0200
> > Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >>> +static void fw_cfg_dma_mem_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
> >>> + uint64_t value,
On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 22:49:12 +0200
Laszlo Ersek wrote:
[...]
> > +static void fw_cfg_dma_mem_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
> > + uint64_t value, unsigned size)
> > +{
> > +FWCfgState *s = opaque;
> > +
> > +s->dma_addr = be64_to_cpu(value);
> > +fw_c
On 08/06/15 23:11, Marc Marí wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 22:49:12 +0200
> Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> +static void fw_cfg_dma_mem_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
>>> + uint64_t value, unsigned size)
>>> +{
>>> +FWCfgState *s = opaque;
>>> +
>>> +s
On 08/06/15 13:01, Marc Marí wrote:
> Based on the specifications on docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt
>
> This interface is an addon. The old interface can still be used as usual.
>
> For x86 arch, this addon will use one extra port (0x512). For ARM, it will
> use 8 more bytes, following the actual implemen
On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 10:47:21 -0400
"Kevin O'Connor" wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 01:01:16PM +0200, Marc Marí wrote:
> > Based on the specifications on docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt
> >
> > This interface is an addon. The old interface can still be used as
> > usual.
> >
> > For x86 arch, this addon
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 01:01:16PM +0200, Marc Marí wrote:
> Based on the specifications on docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt
>
> This interface is an addon. The old interface can still be used as usual.
>
> For x86 arch, this addon will use one extra port (0x512). For ARM, it will
> use 8 more bytes, follow
Based on the specifications on docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt
This interface is an addon. The old interface can still be used as usual.
For x86 arch, this addon will use one extra port (0x512). For ARM, it will
use 8 more bytes, following the actual implementation.
Based on Gerd Hoffman's initial impleme
10 matches
Mail list logo
