On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 07/07/2012 09:56, Blue Swirl ha scritto:
>> These don't seem useful. I think DMA accessors should also be used.
>
> This is a paravirtualized device model, so I think no (like virtio).
>
> I agree that this patch can be dropped and the fun
Il 07/07/2012 09:56, Blue Swirl ha scritto:
> These don't seem useful. I think DMA accessors should also be used.
This is a paravirtualized device model, so I think no (like virtio).
I agree that this patch can be dropped and the functions inlined
manually in pvscsi.c (patch 4).
Paolo
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 5:05 AM, Deep Debroy wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Deep Debroy
> ---
> hw/vmware_utils.h | 126
> +
> 1 file changed, 126 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 hw/vmware_utils.h
>
> diff --git a/hw/vmware_utils.h b/hw/vmware_ut
Signed-off-by: Deep Debroy
---
hw/vmware_utils.h | 126 +
1 file changed, 126 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 hw/vmware_utils.h
diff --git a/hw/vmware_utils.h b/hw/vmware_utils.h
new file mode 100644
index 000..73b039e
--- /dev/null
+++
