On 20.08.2014 21:22, Eric Blake wrote:
On 08/20/2014 11:59 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
Being able to set the overlap-check option to a string and then refine
it via the overlap-check.* options is a nice idea for the command line
but does not work so well for non-flattened dicts. In that case, one can
o
On 08/20/2014 01:22 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 08/20/2014 11:59 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
>> Being able to set the overlap-check option to a string and then refine
>> it via the overlap-check.* options is a nice idea for the command line
>> but does not work so well for non-flattened dicts. In that case
On 08/20/2014 11:59 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
> Being able to set the overlap-check option to a string and then refine
> it via the overlap-check.* options is a nice idea for the command line
> but does not work so well for non-flattened dicts. In that case, one can
> only specify either but not both, s
Being able to set the overlap-check option to a string and then refine
it via the overlap-check.* options is a nice idea for the command line
but does not work so well for non-flattened dicts. In that case, one can
only specify either but not both, so add a field to overlap-check.*
which does the s
