On 05/18/2017 09:32 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
Not sure why I included a trailing dot in the subject line; a maintainer
can remove that if desired.
> The lone caller that cares about a return of BDRV_BLOCK_RAW
> completely replaces the return value, so there is no point in
> passing BDRV_BLOCK_DATA.
The lone caller that cares about a return of BDRV_BLOCK_RAW
completely replaces the return value, so there is no point in
passing BDRV_BLOCK_DATA.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake
---
block/commit.c | 2 +-
block/mirror.c | 2 +-
block/raw-format.c | 2 +-
block/vpc.c| 2 +-
4 files cha
