On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2013-08-13 05:15, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
>> If slirp needs to emulate tcp timeout, then the timeout value
>> for mainloop should be more precise, which is determined by
>> slirp's fasttimo or slowtimo.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan
>> ---
>
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2013-08-13 10:25, liu ping fan wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2013-08-13 05:15, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
If slirp needs to emulate tcp timeout, then the timeout value
for mainloop should be more prec
On 2013-08-13 10:25, liu ping fan wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2013-08-13 05:15, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
>>> If slirp needs to emulate tcp timeout, then the timeout value
>>> for mainloop should be more precise, which is determined by
>>> slirp's fasttimo or slowti
On 2013-08-13 05:15, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
> If slirp needs to emulate tcp timeout, then the timeout value
> for mainloop should be more precise, which is determined by
> slirp's fasttimo or slowtimo.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan
> ---
> main-loop.c | 2 +-
> slirp/slirp.c | 18 +
If slirp needs to emulate tcp timeout, then the timeout value
for mainloop should be more precise, which is determined by
slirp's fasttimo or slowtimo.
Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan
---
main-loop.c | 2 +-
slirp/slirp.c | 18 ++
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
