On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 02:41:51PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 22/08/2013 14:43, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto:
> > On 08/21/13 19:06, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> Il 21/08/2013 19:07, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> >
> >>> NACK
> >>
> >> You know that a single developer's NACK counts nothing (it ca
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:50:43AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Laszlo Ersek writes:
>
> > On 08/21/13 19:06, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> Il 21/08/2013 19:07, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> >
> >>> NACK
> >>
> >> You know that a single developer's NACK counts nothing (it can be you,
> >> it c
Laszlo Ersek writes:
> On 08/21/13 19:06, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 21/08/2013 19:07, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>
>>> NACK
>>
>> You know that a single developer's NACK counts nothing (it can be you,
>> it can be me), don't you?
>
> going meta...
>
> What's this?
>
> All I know (... I thin
Il 22/08/2013 14:43, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto:
> On 08/21/13 19:06, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 21/08/2013 19:07, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>
>>> NACK
>>
>> You know that a single developer's NACK counts nothing (it can be you,
>> it can be me), don't you?
>
> going meta...
>
> What's this?
>
On 08/21/13 19:06, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 21/08/2013 19:07, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>> NACK
>
> You know that a single developer's NACK counts nothing (it can be you,
> it can be me), don't you?
going meta...
What's this?
All I know (... I think I know) about patch acceptance is that
Il 21/08/2013 19:35, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
> Am 21.08.2013 19:01, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
>> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 06:43:16PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> The pvpanic situation is already messed up enough. Let us give our
>>> libvirt friends an easy indication that we have untied our
Am 21.08.2013 19:01, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 06:43:16PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> The pvpanic situation is already messed up enough. Let us give our
>> libvirt friends an easy indication that we have untied our side.
>>
>> Not-yet-signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
>>
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 07:06:21PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 21/08/2013 19:07, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 07:01:39PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> Il 21/08/2013 19:01, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> > The pvpanic situation is already messed up enough.
Il 21/08/2013 19:07, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 07:01:39PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 21/08/2013 19:01, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> The pvpanic situation is already messed up enough. Let us give our
> libvirt friends an easy indication that we have
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 07:01:39PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 21/08/2013 19:01, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> >> > The pvpanic situation is already messed up enough. Let us give our
> >> > libvirt friends an easy indication that we have untied our side.
> >> >
> >> > Not-yet-signed-off-b
Il 21/08/2013 19:01, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>> > The pvpanic situation is already messed up enough. Let us give our
>> > libvirt friends an easy indication that we have untied our side.
>> >
>> > Not-yet-signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
>> > ... because we first have to determine how to expo
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 06:43:16PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The pvpanic situation is already messed up enough. Let us give our
> libvirt friends an easy indication that we have untied our side.
>
> Not-yet-signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
> ... because we first have to determine how to expose t
The pvpanic situation is already messed up enough. Let us give our
libvirt friends an easy indication that we have untied our side.
Not-yet-signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
... because we first have to determine how to expose the device's existence
in the ACPI tables or in fw_cfg.
Signed-off-by
13 matches
Mail list logo