On 7 July 2011 16:29, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> Optimally
> we should pass the clock as a pointer or name, not only the baudrate
> (clocks can be stopped, reparented, or have frequency changed
> dynamically -- in fact the OS will most likely manipulate the uart
> source clock frequency during in
Hi,
On 5 July 2011 15:19, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 4 July 2011 23:39, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
>> I'd also prefer that omap2_gpio_init remains a function that
>> does all the qdev magic in omap_gpio.c and with the current signature
>
> I'm not convinced about this. Implementing the GPIO module
On 4 July 2011 23:39, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> Patch looks good overall, but for consistency we should rename
> functions which start with omap2_gpio_module_ to omap2_gpio_ if the
> state pointer passed is no longer the module pointer but instead the
> whole thing pointer. But maybe it would m
Hi,
On 29 June 2011 20:53, Peter Maydell wrote:
> From: Juha Riihimäki
>
> Convert the OMAP GPIO module to qdev.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juha Riihimäki
> [Riku Voipio: Fixes and restructuring patchset]
> Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio
> [Peter Maydell: More fixes and cleanups for upstream submission]
>
From: Juha Riihimäki
Convert the OMAP GPIO module to qdev.
Signed-off-by: Juha Riihimäki
[Riku Voipio: Fixes and restructuring patchset]
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio
[Peter Maydell: More fixes and cleanups for upstream submission]
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell
---
hw/nseries.c | 47 +--
