于 2013-4-3 17:03, Kevin Wolf 写道:
Am 03.04.2013 um 07:35 hat Wenchao Xia geschrieben:
于 2013-4-2 21:59, Kevin Wolf 写道:
Am 01.04.2013 um 12:01 hat Wenchao Xia geschrieben:
Last operaton should be cancelled first.
Signed-off-by: Wenchao Xia
Should it? This commit message does little to con
Am 03.04.2013 um 07:35 hat Wenchao Xia geschrieben:
> 于 2013-4-2 21:59, Kevin Wolf 写道:
> >Am 01.04.2013 um 12:01 hat Wenchao Xia geschrieben:
> >> Last operaton should be cancelled first.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Wenchao Xia
> >
> >Should it? This commit message does little to convince me.
> >
>
于 2013-4-2 21:59, Kevin Wolf 写道:
Am 01.04.2013 um 12:01 hat Wenchao Xia geschrieben:
Last operaton should be cancelled first.
Signed-off-by: Wenchao Xia
Should it? This commit message does little to convince me.
Kevin
I think so, if two request are "snapshot_blkdev ide0 newimage.qcow
Am 01.04.2013 um 12:01 hat Wenchao Xia geschrieben:
> Last operaton should be cancelled first.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wenchao Xia
Should it? This commit message does little to convince me.
Kevin
于 2013-4-1 23:52, Eric Blake 写道:
On 04/01/2013 04:01 AM, Wenchao Xia wrote:
Last operaton should be cancelled first.
s/operaton/operation/
[I don't care enough about US vs. UK to say whether canceled or
cancelled looks better]
Signed-off-by: Wenchao Xia
---
blockdev.c |2 +-
1 f
On 04/01/2013 04:01 AM, Wenchao Xia wrote:
> Last operaton should be cancelled first.
s/operaton/operation/
[I don't care enough about US vs. UK to say whether canceled or
cancelled looks better]
>
> Signed-off-by: Wenchao Xia
> ---
> blockdev.c |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+)
Last operaton should be cancelled first.
Signed-off-by: Wenchao Xia
---
blockdev.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/blockdev.c b/blockdev.c
index 75416fb..a24d10e 100644
--- a/blockdev.c
+++ b/blockdev.c
@@ -954,7 +954,7 @@ void qmp_transaction(Blockdev
