Am 08.02.2014 um 00:24 hat Laszlo Ersek geschrieben:
> On 02/07/14 22:45, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 07.02.2014 um 17:27 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> >> On 02/07/2014 09:12 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >>> The behaviour of the ROUND_UP macro with negative numbers isn't obvious.
> >>> It happens to do the
On 02/07/14 22:45, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 07.02.2014 um 17:27 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
>> On 02/07/2014 09:12 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> The behaviour of the ROUND_UP macro with negative numbers isn't obvious.
>>> It happens to do the right thing in this please, but better avoid it.
>>
>> s/pleas
Am 07.02.2014 um 17:27 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> On 02/07/2014 09:12 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > The behaviour of the ROUND_UP macro with negative numbers isn't obvious.
> > It happens to do the right thing in this please, but better avoid it.
>
> s/please/place/
Indeed... Thanks, fixed it loca
On 02/07/2014 09:12 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> The behaviour of the ROUND_UP macro with negative numbers isn't obvious.
> It happens to do the right thing in this please, but better avoid it.
s/please/place/
>
> Suggested-by: Laszlo Ersek
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf
> ---
> block.c | 4 ++--
> 1
The behaviour of the ROUND_UP macro with negative numbers isn't obvious.
It happens to do the right thing in this please, but better avoid it.
Suggested-by: Laszlo Ersek
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf
---
block.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block.c b/block