Il 21/01/2014 22:12, Vadim Rozenfeld ha scritto:
>
> If you are planning some level of backwards compatibility with RHEL6, it
> may make sense to use separate subsections.
I believe we have to make it backward compatible. In RHEL6 we added
support for relaxed timers only, but upstream doesn't ha
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 11:21 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 21/01/2014 09:02, Vadim Rozenfeld ha scritto:
> > From: Vadim Rozenfeld
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vadim Rozenfeld
> > ---
> > linux-headers/asm-x86/hyperv.h | 3 +++
> > linux-headers/linux/kvm.h | 1 +
> > target-i386/cpu-qom.h
Il 21/01/2014 09:02, Vadim Rozenfeld ha scritto:
> From: Vadim Rozenfeld
>
> Signed-off-by: Vadim Rozenfeld
> ---
> linux-headers/asm-x86/hyperv.h | 3 +++
> linux-headers/linux/kvm.h | 1 +
> target-i386/cpu-qom.h | 1 +
> target-i386/cpu.c | 1 +
> target-i386/c
From: Vadim Rozenfeld
Signed-off-by: Vadim Rozenfeld
---
linux-headers/asm-x86/hyperv.h | 3 +++
linux-headers/linux/kvm.h | 1 +
target-i386/cpu-qom.h | 1 +
target-i386/cpu.c | 1 +
target-i386/cpu.h | 1 +
target-i386/kvm.c | 19 +
