On 08/24/2010 03:16 PM, Chen Cao wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 03:04:44PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/24/2010 03:07 PM, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 02:42:18PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/24/2010 02:35 PM, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
Add Cc: m...@redhat.com.
MAX_PCI_SL
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 03:04:44PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/24/2010 03:07 PM, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> >On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 02:42:18PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> On 08/24/2010 02:35 PM, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> >>>Add Cc: m...@redhat.com.
> >>>
> >>>MAX_PCI_SLOTS should be in pci.h i
On 08/24/2010 03:24 PM, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 03:04:44PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/24/2010 03:07 PM, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 02:42:18PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/24/2010 02:35 PM, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
Add Cc: m...@redhat.com.
MAX
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 03:04:44PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/24/2010 03:07 PM, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 02:42:18PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 08/24/2010 02:35 PM, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
Add Cc: m...@redhat.com.
MAX_PCI_SLOTS should be in pci.h in
On 08/24/2010 03:07 PM, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 02:42:18PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/24/2010 02:35 PM, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
Add Cc: m...@redhat.com.
MAX_PCI_SLOTS should be in pci.h instead of qdev.h?
And the name should be start with PCI_ prefix for consistency?
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 02:42:18PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/24/2010 02:35 PM, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
>> Add Cc: m...@redhat.com.
>>
>> MAX_PCI_SLOTS should be in pci.h instead of qdev.h?
>> And the name should be start with PCI_ prefix for consistency?
>>
>> Except that, the patches look ok
On 08/24/2010 02:35 PM, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
Add Cc: m...@redhat.com.
MAX_PCI_SLOTS should be in pci.h instead of qdev.h?
And the name should be start with PCI_ prefix for consistency?
Except that, the patches look okay.
These aren't slots, are they? They are functions.
There's a lot of
Add Cc: m...@redhat.com.
MAX_PCI_SLOTS should be in pci.h instead of qdev.h?
And the name should be start with PCI_ prefix for consistency?
Except that, the patches look okay.
thanks,
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 02:49:27PM +0800, Ken CC wrote:
> Define MAX_PCI_SLOTS as 0x1f, if pci addr provided fr
Define MAX_PCI_SLOTS as 0x1f, if pci addr provided from command line
is bigger than 0x1f, return error -EINVAL.
0x1f << 3 | 7 == 255 (PCIBUS_MAX_DEVICES - 1)
Signed-off-by: Ken CC
---
hw/qdev-properties.c |2 ++
hw/qdev.h|3 +++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(
Define MAX_PCI_SLOTS as 0x1f, if pci addr provided from command line
is bigger than 0x1f, return error -EINVAL.
0x1f << 3 | 7 == 255 (PCIBUS_MAX_DEVICES - 1)
Signed-off-by: Ken CC
---
hw/qdev-properties.c |2 ++
hw/qdev.h|3 +++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(
10 matches
Mail list logo