* Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
I'm still pretty convinced that there's an existing problem with
this mutex can get init'd twice with no destroy on a second migration,
however you're not changing that (and it's not actually failed as
far as I can tell)
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 09:45:17PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
---
migration/ram.c | 15 ---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
index a890179..ae2b89f 100644
--- a/migration/ram.c
+++ b/migration/ram.c
@@ -184,6 +184,8 @@ struct RAMState {
uint64_t xbzr
