Eric Blake writes:
> On 08/10/2012 10:04 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> We've had a cycle to tweak. It is time to commit to supporting them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori
>> ---
>> qapi-schema.json | 19 ---
>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> d
On 08/10/2012 10:04 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> We've had a cycle to tweak. It is time to commit to supporting them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori
> ---
> qapi-schema.json | 19 ---
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/qapi-schema.json b/
We've had a cycle to tweak. It is time to commit to supporting them.
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori
---
qapi-schema.json | 19 ---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/qapi-schema.json b/qapi-schema.json
index 191a889..a938c8d 100644
--- a/qapi-schem
Luiz Capitulino writes:
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 08:37:14 -0500
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>> We've had a cycle to tweak. It is time to commit to supporting them.
>
> qmp_qom_get() and qpm_qom_set() still use the legacy monitor interface, can't
> we convert it to the qapi?
qapi doesn't have a con
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 08:37:14 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> We've had a cycle to tweak. It is time to commit to supporting them.
qmp_qom_get() and qpm_qom_set() still use the legacy monitor interface, can't
we convert it to the qapi?
>
> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori
> ---
> qapi-schema.js
We've had a cycle to tweak. It is time to commit to supporting them.
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori
---
qapi-schema.json | 19 ---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/qapi-schema.json b/qapi-schema.json
index 015a84a..28e9914 100644
--- a/qapi-schem