Paolo Bonzini writes:
> Il 02/10/2012 22:12, Alex Williamson ha scritto:
>> On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 14:55 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> Alex Williamson writes:
>>>
In the event that a pci-assign device is added to a chipset that
hasn't yet implemented the INTx routing interface, exit
Il 02/10/2012 22:12, Alex Williamson ha scritto:
> On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 14:55 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Alex Williamson writes:
>>
>>> In the event that a pci-assign device is added to a chipset that
>>> hasn't yet implemented the INTx routing interface, exit gracefully
>>> instead of kill
On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 14:55 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Alex Williamson writes:
>
> > In the event that a pci-assign device is added to a chipset that
> > hasn't yet implemented the INTx routing interface, exit gracefully
> > instead of killing the VM. I'm sure we'll implement this for q35,
Alex Williamson writes:
> In the event that a pci-assign device is added to a chipset that
> hasn't yet implemented the INTx routing interface, exit gracefully
> instead of killing the VM. I'm sure we'll implement this for q35,
> but there's no reason for such a harsh response.
>
> Signed-off-by
In the event that a pci-assign device is added to a chipset that
hasn't yet implemented the INTx routing interface, exit gracefully
instead of killing the VM. I'm sure we'll implement this for q35,
but there's no reason for such a harsh response.
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson
---
hw/kvm/pci-a
