On 05/20/2013 11:15 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 20/05/2013 17:05, Eric Blake ha scritto:
On 05/20/2013 04:59 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 20/05/2013 12:43, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
Il 20/05/2013 08:51, Lei Li ha scritto:
Now we have ringbuf char
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 20/05/2013 17:05, Eric Blake ha scritto:
> On 05/20/2013 04:59 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 20/05/2013 12:43, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
>>> Il 20/05/2013 08:51, Lei Li ha scritto:
Now we have ringbuf char device, but the backend name of it
>
On 05/20/2013 04:59 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 20/05/2013 12:43, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
>> Il 20/05/2013 08:51, Lei Li ha scritto:
>>> Now we have ringbuf char device, but the backend name of it
>>> is a little confusion. We actually register it by 'memory', but
>>> the description in qemu-op
Il 20/05/2013 12:43, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
> Il 20/05/2013 08:51, Lei Li ha scritto:
>> Now we have ringbuf char device, but the backend name of it
>> is a little confusion. We actually register it by 'memory', but
>> the description in qemu-option, the name of open functions
>> and the new api
Il 20/05/2013 08:51, Lei Li ha scritto:
> Now we have ringbuf char device, but the backend name of it
> is a little confusion. We actually register it by 'memory', but
> the description in qemu-option, the name of open functions
> and the new api backend called it 'ringbuf'. It should keep
> consis
Now we have ringbuf char device, but the backend name of it
is a little confusion. We actually register it by 'memory', but
the description in qemu-option, the name of open functions
and the new api backend called it 'ringbuf'. It should keep
consistent. This patch named it all to 'ringbuf'.
Signe
